Washington Times
6 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from Washington Times — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
6audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
3carried a framing split
3spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“The White House paused strikes on Iranian targets for a second straight day Sunday, creating space for diplomatic efforts”
July 27, 2026 · see it in context →“a liberal superstar”
July 24, 2026 · see it in context →“has been coy about her plans”
July 24, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing Washington Times
- Twelve Newsrooms Requested the Same 1,141-Page Diary. Eleven Came Back With a Different Book.July 29, 2026
- Graham Eulogized at the National Cathedral, and Ten Newsrooms Buried Ten Different MenJuly 28, 2026
- Three Nights by One Clock, Two Days by Another: timing the Iran pauseJuly 27, 2026
- Unacceptable Theft: by the third outlet, China's covert lab had grown a footnoteJuly 26, 2026
- AOC Leads New Hampshire by One Point in a 2028 Poll, and the Coverage Cannot Hold ItJuly 24, 2026
- A Complete and Total Endorsement: Russell Fry defied it four days laterJuly 21, 2026
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.
