Washington Post
3 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from Washington Post — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
3audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
2carried a framing split
4spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“his recent shaky endorsement record after his candidates suffered losses in at least 10 primary races this year, including high-profile defeats in Iowa, Georgia, Tennessee, Florida and Wyoming”
August 26, 2026 · see it in context →“according to three former officials”
August 26, 2026 · see it in context →“They demand that Meta pay as much as $1.4 trillion”
August 22, 2026 · see it in context →“Safari lodges, resorts and hotels plan breakfasts on the flat-topped Mount Ololokwe, which sits more than 6,500 feet above sea level, offering views of roaming elephants and other wildlife.”
August 21, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing Washington Post
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.