Times of London
3 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from Times of London — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
3audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
2carried a framing split
2spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“Police clarified that the white van 'didn't exactly hit the parade,' but, because it drove through the park, 'attacked the people who were going away from the parade'”
July 26, 2026 · see it in context →“Meanwhile there were suggestions that the allegations against Khan might be part of a secret effort by Israel to damage his reputation, though the UN investigation was said to have gathered testimony from 'multiple credible witnesses' dismissing the suggestion that she was a spy.”
July 25, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing Times of London
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.