The Wall Street Journal
6 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from The Wall Street Journal — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
6audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
5carried a framing split
3spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“they fielded questions about security threats, the court's ethics code”
July 14, 2026 · see it in context →“a hawkish advocate of the war on Iran”
July 12, 2026 · see it in context →“Iran Hatched Fresh Plot to Kill Trump”
July 11, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing The Wall Street Journal
- "Theoretical": one Fauci text, filed as an admission, a concern, and a debateAugust 11, 2026
- Barred From a Strait That May Not Reopen: Iran, US warships, and the Hormuz dealAugust 8, 2026
- Kagan and Barrett Before Congress for the First Time Since 2019, Asking for MoneyJuly 14, 2026
- Lindsey Graham Died at 71, and the First Hour of Obituaries Buried Three MenJuly 12, 2026
- Israel Told the US That Iran Plotted to Kill Trump. In a Day It Was Two Warnings.July 11, 2026
- Trump Cancels a Housing Bill Signing an Hour Out, Holding It for the SAVE ActJune 24, 2026
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.