The Intercept
3 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from The Intercept — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
3audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
2carried a framing split
3spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“Fetterman, who takes a hard pro-Israel line, was the lone holdout in his party despite having one of his constituents being the most recent Palestinian American killed in the West Bank by Israeli settlers.”
September 30, 2026 · see it in context →“The most recent U.S. citizen killed by settlers in the West Bank was a 19-year-old from Philadelphia.”
September 30, 2026 · see it in context →“DCAS was, uncharacteristically, not updated as of Monday afternoon and instead offered outdated figures posted Friday morning.”
July 20, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing The Intercept
- Fetterman Alone With the GOP on West Bank Killings, and a Tally the Desks Total Two WaysSeptember 30, 2026
- DoorDash's $131.5M Settlement Ran in Sixteen Outlets; the $1.4M It Spent Against Mamdani Ran in OneSeptember 24, 2026
- Regularly Updated: the Pentagon's Iran-war casualty database, still showing FridayJuly 20, 2026
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.