The Epoch Times
3 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from The Epoch Times — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
3audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
1carried a framing split
3spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“The majority of the federal appeals court, Judges Mark Bennett and Gabriel Sanchez, dismissed the DOJ's emergency motion and remanded the matter back to the lower court, which is scheduled to hold a hearing on Oct. 27. Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented.”
October 27, 2026 · see it in context →“Trump Says He Will 'Veto Everything' If Democrats Win Midterms”
October 25, 2026 · see it in context →“Justice Elena Kagan granted a brief administrative stay that is set to expire at 5 p.m. on Aug. 13.”
August 14, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing The Epoch Times
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.