New Republic
3 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from New Republic — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
3audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
2carried a framing split
11spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“President Trump verbally rebuked multiple reporters during his anti-fraud website announcement in the Oval Office on Tuesday afternoon.”
October 21, 2026 · see it in context →“In the recording, Paxton is asked: "Do you feel like he's a little bit of a drag?" It is not immediately clear to whom the speaker is referring.”
September 30, 2026 · see it in context →“Well, guess what? They served 60 days. It wasn't what we wanted, but we did not control the situation. We did our best.”
September 29, 2026 · see it in context →“Paxton's remarks came at a United States Hispanic Business Council forum in Fort Worth on Monday.”
September 29, 2026 · see it in context →“letting a child predator out of jail after just two months”
September 29, 2026 · see it in context →“The White House on Thursday continued denying CNN, MS NOW, and Politico access to the White House, even after Trump-appointed District Court Judge Timothy Kelly struck down the president's sweeping ban late Wednesday night.”
September 24, 2026 · see it in context →“the 10 used jets”
August 15, 2026 · see it in context →“can essentially go on paid medical leave for as long as he wants" ... "is disgraceful”
July 29, 2026 · see it in context →“The fact that our elected officials don't really have to prove that they can walk, talk, and think coherently -- while we still pay them -- is disgraceful”
July 29, 2026 · see it in context →“disgraced attorney and Israel supporter Alan Dershowitz, who is implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein files”
July 29, 2026 · see it in context →“If acted upon, Trump's warning could open up a new front in the already complicated Iran war”
July 23, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing New Republic
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.