Democracy Docket
30 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from Democracy Docket — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
30audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
19carried a framing split
31spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“Quiñones' departure could signal the end of the politically motivated investigation.”
November 7, 2026 · see it in context →“Gessler said he worked as an election expert for the Trump campaign in 2020. Ahead of the 2024 election, Gessler was Trump's attorney when Colorado voters unsuccessfully challenged Trump's ability to appear on the state's Republican presidential primary ballot and any future ballot because of his role leading up to the…”
November 7, 2026 · see it in context →“The statement came from attorney Scott Gessler, Colorado's former Republican secretary of state and an election denier who has echoed President Donald Trump's debunked claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election.”
November 7, 2026 · see it in context →“But despite Trump’s brutal shellacking, numerous threats to the vote persist.”
November 5, 2026 · see it in context →“Gleason dismissed the lawsuit for lack of standing and denied DOJ leave to amend, finding that another rewrite would be futile”
November 1, 2026 · see it in context →“The Trump administration disclosed Friday that it contacted five states over the past four months, demanding they disenfranchise people it claims are ineligible to vote in the midterms.”
October 30, 2026 · see it in context →“The DOJ asserted that the federal government did not seek to bar people from voting through the letters to the five states.”
October 30, 2026 · see it in context →“it separately sent all states letters Thursday”
October 30, 2026 · see it in context →“The plaintiffs want the court to require a 100% statewide hand count before results for federal races can be certified.”
October 29, 2026 · see it in context →“The lawsuit attempts to turn a case against one county official into a statewide challenge by asking the court to certify a class of Texas county election administrators, with Benge serving as their representative.”
October 29, 2026 · see it in context →“His Amarillo courtroom has drawn scrutiny over judge shopping because the division has historically allowed litigants filing there to reliably land before Kacsmaryk.”
October 29, 2026 · see it in context →“The extraordinary request rests on speculative claims about artificial intelligence, foreign-made voting machine components and the possibility of undetected hacking.”
October 29, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing Democracy Docket
- A Memory Card Never Uploaded Narrows Georgia's New Democratic House Majority to One SeatNovember 7, 2026
- Same Resignation, Different Footnotes: Quiñones Exits, and Each Newsroom Packs Its Own SuitcaseNovember 7, 2026
- DOJ Sends About 1,000 Election Monitors to All 50 States. The Coverage Reads Three WaysNovember 3, 2026
- Five States, Fifty States, and the Counties That Said No to Federal MonitorsOctober 30, 2026
- Potter County GOP Suit Asks a Federal Judge for a Statewide Hand Count Before CertificationOctober 29, 2026
- The $1 Million Voter-Fraud Reward Has No Payer in Any BucketOctober 27, 2026
- At Least 18 California Counties, One 48-Hour Ballot DeadlineOctober 24, 2026
- One DHS Ruling, Six Widths of "Halt"October 23, 2026
- The 20,000-Name List Traveled Everywhere. The 200-Record Sample Did Not.October 22, 2026
- The Letter Said 'Identified.' The Lawsuit Said 'Likely.' California Read Both.October 18, 2026
- Election Denial as a Core Belief, and the Count Some Desks File as GuardedOctober 11, 2026
- Six Left-Bucket Accounts of the ICE Voter-Records Documents, and No Other BucketOctober 7, 2026
- The Ask Lands on Commerce, and the Only Lawyer in the File Says NoOctober 7, 2026
- The Midterm Excuse Has Several Drafts, One Outlet Owning The Word, And No SignaturesOctober 7, 2026
- Georgia's Election Board Asked DOJ to Void Its Own Machines. Almost Nobody Filed, and the Wire Filed Something Else.October 2, 2026
- The Department That Changed Its Name Between the Wire and the RepublishOctober 2, 2026
- "7-2," "6-1-2," or Nothing at All: How the Press Counted a Supreme Court Order That Published No CountSeptember 16, 2026
- Missouri's top court found its secretary of state in contempt and cleared him the same afternoon, and every desk in the file agrees on exactly how that happened.September 12, 2026
- Eight newsrooms, one filing, and the only word they all agree on is the one inside the acronymSeptember 9, 2026
- Talwani Extends the Mail-Ballot Block Through the Midterms, and the Filing Chasing Her Grows StaleSeptember 5, 2026
- The Court Cleared Mail Voting for Trump and Then Hedged Its Own OrderAugust 25, 2026
- The Expert's Own Column Carried the Smaller Number. Fox's Interview With Him Did Not.August 15, 2026
- Voter Rules, $1.15 Trillion, and a Stock-Trading Ban: one House afternoonJuly 22, 2026
- 214-211 to Start Merging the SAVE Act Into the NDAA, Already Reported as DoneJuly 21, 2026
- Actively Reviving the Full SAVE Act Inside the Budget Bill, a Week After It DiedJuly 21, 2026
- The SAVE Act Heads to a Reconciliation Floor Vote, and Two Friendly Outlets DisagreeJuly 21, 2026
- The SAVE Act Fight Is Fake: Massie, and the week Senate conservatives said otherwiseJuly 21, 2026
- Remaking, Dismantling, or Integrity: Trump's whole-of-government election pushJuly 19, 2026
- Supports Its Core Tenets, Voting Against It: Murkowski on the SAVE ActJuly 19, 2026
- The Ossoff and Warnock Claim Traces to a Single Anonymous TweetJuly 14, 2026
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.
