Ars Technica
3 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from Ars Technica — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
3audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
3carried a framing split
4spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“Hundreds of employees at the US robotics firm Boston Dynamics signed a petition calling for executives to halt a sale of the company's robot dogs to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement”
October 27, 2026 · see it in context →“The 300 signatures come out of a total Boston Dynamics workforce of approximately 1,400 people.”
October 27, 2026 · see it in context →“This will likely serve as a wake-up call to those not paying attention to the US-China space race—which, to be clear, is the vast majority of Americans.”
August 22, 2026 · see it in context →“This is the latest and most sophisticated mission in China's successful lunar exploration program”
August 22, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing Ars Technica
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.