The Morning Read for Monday, September 15

The morning read for Monday, September 15 | SCOTUSblog Search SCOTUSblog Search articles and cases ESC Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. Skip to main content Cases Statistics Calendar Justices Login News Commentary About Newsletters Podcasts Subscribe Merits Cases Court News Explainers Emergency appeals and applications WHAT WE'RE READING The morning read for Monday, September 15 By Kelsey Dallas / Sep 15, 2025 Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Monday morning read: On the Supreme Court’s Emergency Docket, Sharp Partisan Divides (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) — A new analysis prepared for  The New York Times  by professors Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, and Michael J. Nelson shows that the Trump administration has a notably higher success rate on the emergency docket than the Biden administration did. “[T]he Trump administration [is] prevailing much more often than its predecessor had — 84 percent of the time, compared with 53 percent for the Biden administration. That is perhaps unsurprising, given that the court is dominated by six Republican appointees,” Adam Liptak wrote. He warned that the emergency applications filed under each administration dealt with different issues, so “true apples-to-apples comparisons are hard to come by,” and also noted that the Trump administration’s success rate in front of the court could drop once such cases return to the justices on the merits docket. “In general, Professor Epstein said that in cases involving the government, ‘partisan politics plays out far more in the emergency applications than in the merits cases.’” Trump administration unlawfully directed mass US worker terminations, judge rules (Nate Raymond, Reuters) — U.S. District Judge William Alsup continues to believe “that the U.S. Office of Personnel Management in February unlawfully ordered numerous agencies to fire probationary employees en masse,” but he announced on Friday that he will not again order the Trump administration to reinstate the fired workers, in part because the Supreme Court has blocked several such orders in recent months, including one of his own, according to Reuters . “[T]he Supreme Court has made clear enough by way of its emergency docket that it will overrule judicially granted relief respecting hirings and firings within the executive, not just in this case but in others,” Alsup wrote in his Friday ruling . Rather than requiring workers to be reinstated, the judge ordered “19 agencies, including the U.S. Departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Energy, Interior and Treasury, to update the employees’ files by November 14” and make it clear that they weren’t fired due to performance issues. Man Indicted Over Threats to ‘Hunt’ Supreme Court and Federal Judges (Jenna Sundel, Newsweek) — A 72-year-old man has been indicted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Minnesota for “threatening to assault and murder a federal judge and a Supreme Court justice, as well as interstate transmission of threats to injure others,” according to Newsweek . The man, Robert Phillip Ivers, was arrested in Wayzata, Minnesota, earlier this month after advertising a manifesto on attacking judges in a public library. “The charges come as threats against federal judges are on the rise. The U.S. Marshals Service has recorded 513 threats to federal judges this fiscal year as of September 2. The Marshals Service recorded 509 total threats in the 2024 fiscal year,” Newsweek reported. Trump asks Congress for $58 million in security funding (Libbey Dean, NewsNation) — On a related note, the Trump administration “has requested Congress to spend an additional $58 million for the U.S. Marshals Service to expand security for the executive branch and Supreme Court justices,” according to NewsNation . The administration believes the additional funds are needed to address a surge in “threats against public officials.” Barrett addresses Charlie Kirk killing, calls for civility (Zach Schonfeld, The Hill) — Justice Amy Coney Barrett spoke about political violence on Friday after being asked about Charlie Kirk’s death during an appearance at the University of Notre Dame, according to The Hill . She described it as “the most grotesque symptom” of a failure to respectfully disagree, stressing the need to “learn to have disagreements in a civil and collegial way.” Barrett was also asked about her own safety, The Hill reported. “I’m in very good hands, so I feel safe, but we do have round-the-clock security,” she said. Kelsey Dallas Managing Editor Kelsey Dallas is SCOTUSblog's managing editor and the primary author of the SCOTUStoday newsletter. Recommended Citation: Kelsey Dallas , The morning read for Monday, September 15 , SCOTUSblog ( Sep. 15, 2025, 9:00 AM ), https://www.scotusblog.com /2025/09/the-morning-read-for-monday-september-15/ Share Copy Twitter Email Related Articles Announcing The SCOTUSblog Summit: 2026 Term Preview By SCOTUSblog Staff / Republican groups file emergency application to court on broadcasting rates for political ads By Amy Howe / Aug 31, 2026 Supreme Court allows construction on White House ballroom to continue By Amy Howe / Aug 31, 2026 Justice Alito’s financial disclosure for 2025 is released By Amy Howe / Aug 31, 2026 Updates on the new birthright citizenship executive order and mail-in ballots By Kelsey Dallas / Aug 31, 2026 Each weekday, we present news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court in a smart, approachable way. Stay informed on every decision. Receive essential Court news every morning. SCOTUSblog The premier source for Supreme Court news, analysis, and data since 2002. Independent and non-partisan. Coverage Latest News Recurring Columns Outside Opinions Interim Docket Blog Coverage Latest News Recurring Columns Outside Opinions Interim Docket Blog Cases Oral Argument Docket Interim Docket Petitions Capital Cases Calendar Statistics Cases Oral Argument Docket Interim Docket Petitions Capital Cases Calendar Statistics Podcasts Advisory Opinions Amarica's Constitution Divided Argument Podcasts Advisory Opinions Amarica's Constitution Divided Argument Newsletters SCOTUStoday SCOTUS Opinions Advisory Opinions Newsletters SCOTUStoday SCOTUS Opinions Advisory Opinions About Manifesto Staff Contact Us Advertising Submissions FAQs Merch About Manifesto Staff Contact Us Advertising Submissions FAQs Merch © 2026 SCOTUSblog. All rights reserved. Archive Privacy Policy Editorial Policy Terms of Use Welcome Tell us a bit about yourself and choose what you’d like to hear from us. You can change any of it any time in your account. First name * Last name * Job title (optional) Select your job title Law firm associate Law firm partner Law firm other Professor/educator In-house counsel Judge Law student Government lawyer Lawyer, other Non-lawyer Journalist Company (optional) Save and continue Not now