Skip to content
Supreme Court lifts injunction blocking Trump's attack on mail voting before midterms
The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed President Donald Trump's executive order restricting mail voting to proceed, granting emergency appeals from the Department of Justice and a dozen Republican-led states. This decision overturns a lower court's injunction that had blocked implementation of the March executive order, which seeks to expand federal control over mail voting ahead of November's midterm elections. However, the Court only stayed one of two blocking orders—the permanent injunction applying to 23 Democratic-led states and Washington, D.C. A separate nationwide injunction remains active. The Court's Republican-appointed justices concluded that Democratic states had not yet suffered concrete harm, since the policy remained unimplemented. The majority determined that the lower court issued the injunction prematurely, emphasizing that any state injuries would stem from "downstream action that the Secretary might take in the future." The Court's three liberal justices opposed the decision. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that the ruling "needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections." Trump's order directs the U.S. Postal Service to deliver ballots only to voters on pre-approved federal lists. States must design new ballot envelopes with mandatory barcodes, submit them to USPS for approval, and implement these changes before mid-September—when many states begin sending mail ballots 45 days before Election Day. Printing costs alone could reach millions of dollars. Though one injunction was lifted, a broader preliminary injunction in a related lawsuit remains in effect nationwide. The administration has not yet appealed that decision to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals. If USPS's finalized rule harms states after implementation, they could seek additional court intervention. Democratic officials and voting rights advocates strongly opposed the ruling. NAACP President Derrick Johnson stated: "Trump's order has everything to do with maintaining power at all costs," countering administration claims about election integrity. The decision represents another instance of the Supreme Court's conservative majority siding with the Trump administration on emergency "shadow docket" appeals.